Interesting case on medical examinations and conservatorships in Tennessee. Nashville singer/songwriter Danny Tate suffered from substance abuse. One day, a psychiatrist, Dr. William Kenner, showed up at Tate’s door and began asking questions. Less than one week later, Dr. Kenner provided testimony supporting the appointment of a conservator over Tate.
As reported by the Nashville Scene, Dr. Kenner’s medical examination of Tate was a bit unusual. First, as mentioned above, Dr. Kenner performed the examination during an unannounced visit to Tate’s home rather than during a scheduled clinic appointment. Also, apparently, Dr. Kenner did not consult Tate’s treating physician. Further, Dr. Kenner was a child psychiatrist who did not have experience with substance abuse. Finally, Dr. Kenner did not perform objective testing.
Despite the irregularities, the probate court relied on Dr. Kenner’s testimony. And the appellate court affirmed. Perhaps this was because Tate’s condition was so patently obvious? According to the Nashville Scene, even Tate admits that “When Kennedy granted the conservatorship, [] he was in bad shape, wrestling with a drug whose grip was like nothing he’d ever encountered.” Still, from a rule of law perspective, it would have been nice if the court had more fully discussed whether Dr. Kenner qualified as an expert in the field of substance abuse. Also, it would have been nice if the court had more fully discussed whether Dr. Kenner’s irregular examination was even helpful to the court from a scientific perspective.





